I came across this article on my way to check my Yahoo email.
Great. Another global warming denyer trying to make a scene by trying to sue people who sell carbon credits. Ever wonder where the money goes to? Many offsetting businesses fund renewable energy projects, a sector we could be leading the world in. Instead, we continue to use nonreusable fuels such as oil and coal that are detrimental to the environment (smog, CO2, other fun stuff). Wouldn’t the obvious answer be to revolutionize our energy with science and change our resource use? I’m not telling anyone to live in a tree for their life, but we Americans just waste so much. Nordic countries such as Sweden, Norway, and Denmark aremuch more efficient in terms of resource usage per capita and enjoy a much higher quality of life than us.
And the argument that this year’s winter was one of the coolest so global warming is a hoax does NOT work because…
1. It’s climate change, not global warming. Some places will experience different effects.
2. This year is la nina, so it’s supposed to be colder.
The article below might help explain why there’s so much skepticism lately, or more importantly, who’s responsible.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DIRTY_AIR?SITE=NVREN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
This is a great idea to sue Al Gore for fraud. What better way to put the entire debate to rest. No more media twisting truth, public following blindly. The court of law will be an unbiased place for the world to hear both sides of the debate for the first time. If global warming is in fact caused by CO2 emissions, which is the base of this lawsuit, then it will be proven once and for all. And if it is discovered that CO2 does nothing to effect the temperature of our world, then that truth will come out. It is a win-win. You need to understand that this isn’t about where money goes, but about revealing the truth. I am all for more gas efficient vehicles. I am for solar panels on my house. I am just not for selling lies. Sell it in truth, not by scaring the public into submission via media and power point presentations.
I almost had interest in this article till the “denyer” word came up. Which pretty much means the writer believes in Man Made Global Warming no mater what the “Facts” my hold.
I wonder if this guy wrote any “Alarmist” articles in the 70’s of impending doom of the Ice Age?
Joe,
Last time I checked the facts leaned more towards global warming than against. But regardless of whether or not it exists, we should treat the environment with more respect.
And I’m flattered. Do I really write as eloquently as a 40+ year old? Unfortunately, the possibility of me writing any “Alarmist” articles in the 70’s is nonexistent since I was not yet alive then. Check my About Me.